Key Points
- Senate Republicans blocked the FULL HOUSE Act on July 10, 2025, halting efforts to reverse a tax rule capping gambling loss deductions at 90% from 2026.
- The OBBBA provision, taxing $10,000 on a break-even $100,000 bet, threatens professional gamblers and may drive bettors to unregulated platforms.
- Bipartisan support grows for repeal via the FAIR BET Act, but political gridlock and the Byrd Rule complicate progress.
On July 10, 2025, Senate Republicans blocked Nevada Senator Catherine Cortez Masto’s attempt to fast-track the FULL HOUSE Act, which aimed to repeal a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) that reduces gambling loss deductions from 100% to 90% starting in 2026.
The change, inserted to meet Senate budgetary rules, has sparked backlash for taxing bettors on losses, potentially harming the gambling industry. You’re seeing a contentious debate over tax fairness, with implications for professional and casual bettors.
Why the Repeal Effort Failed
The OBBBA, signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, caps gambling loss deductions at 90% of winnings, meaning a bettor breaking even on $100,000 in wins and losses would owe taxes on $10,000. Senator Cortez Masto, supported by bipartisan figures like Senator Ted Cruz, argued the rule unfairly taxes “money gamblers don’t have.”
Indiana Senator Todd Young blocked the unanimous consent vote, citing unrelated provisions, though he expressed support for the repeal. For you, this highlights political gridlock delaying relief for bettors.
See also:
- UK Regulator Probes Sportradar’s $225M Acquisition of IMG Arena
- Allwyn Secures €2.15B Funding to Fuel Global Lottery Expansion
- Flutter Acquires Full Ownership of FanDuel in $1.755B Deal with Boyd Gaming
Impact on Gamblers and the Industry
The tax change, projected to generate $1.1 billion over eight years, significantly impacts professional gamblers who itemize large losses, potentially ending their viability, as warned by poker player Phil Galfond on X.
Casual bettors face similar burdens, with reduced deductions discouraging legal wagering. The American Gaming Association, initially supportive of OBBBA, now backs repeal efforts led by Nevada Representative Dina Titus’s FAIR BET Act (H.R. 4304). For you, this could mean higher tax liabilities and fewer incentives to use regulated platforms.
Challenges and Political Context
The provision, added by Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo to comply with the Byrd Rule, went unnoticed by many senators until after passage, as noted by Senator John Cornyn.
Critics argue the rushed 940-page bill lacked scrutiny, risking economic harm to gambling hubs like Nevada. X posts reflect frustration over the Senate’s inaction, warning of a shift to unregulated platforms. For you, this underscores the need to monitor tax policies affecting betting profitability.
Broader Implications for U.S. Gambling
Parallel efforts in the House via the FAIR BET Act signal bipartisan momentum, but the Senate’s block delays relief before the 2026 effective date. The rule may push bettors to offshore sites, which evade taxes and oversight, increasing risks of fraud.
The gambling industry, contributing $59 billion to U.S. GDP in 2024, faces pressure to adapt, potentially reducing promotions. For you, this suggests a more costly betting environment unless repeal efforts succeed.
Join us on all our social channels and groups
Gameongazette is present on:
