Wednesday, April 23, 2025
HomeNorth AmericaHigh 5 Casino, Apple, and Google Lawsuit Voluntary Dismissed

High 5 Casino, Apple, and Google Lawsuit Voluntary Dismissed

Date:

Follow us

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit, alleging that he lost more than $1,000 on sweepstakes gaming platforms such as WowVegas and High 5 gaming, which he said were unlawful gambling sites masquerading as social casinos.

Julian Bargo has dropped a lawsuit against major tech companies Apple and Google as well as sweepstakes casinos. The lawsuit was filed by Bargo in November 2024. It claimed that by permitting sweepstakes casino apps to operate on their platforms, the businesses were contributing to illicit gambling.

For over five months, the lawsuit made little headway. Bargo then sent the New Jersey District Court a notice to dismiss without prejudice. He took this decision shortly before the defendants were supposed to file applications to have the case dismissed. Bargo may potentially refile the claim because the case was dismissed without prejudice.

Bargo filed a lawsuit, claiming he lost more than $1,000 on a number of casino sweepstakes sites, including WowVegas and High 5 Casino. According to him, these networks operated as illicit gambling websites masquerading as social casinos.


See also:


The lawsuit also claimed that by enabling in-app purchases through their services and listing these apps in their stores, Apple and Google were complicit. In accordance with the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, the tech corporations were named in the case.

This Act is frequently utilized to prosecute organizations that are alleged to have participated in unlawful or fraudulent schemes.

Bargo’s case clarifies the ongoing debate regarding the legality of sweepstakes casinos and the role that internet platforms play in their operations, despite the fact that it did not result in a judicial ruling.

As the debate over the Sweepstakes Casino heats up, lawmakers are pushing for stricter regulations.

Sweepstakes casinos are under increased legal scrutiny and may be banned in some countries, even though this particular complaint was abandoned. In states like Maryland, Mississippi, and New Jersey, lawmakers are calling for stricter regulations or outright prohibitions on sweepstakes casinos. They are concerned about unlawful gambling, inadequate protections for consumers, and potential harm to vulnerable gamers, especially children.

Critics claim that these platforms operate in a legal limbo, evading the taxes and permit costs that traditional casinos are required to pay. As a result, authorities have taken decisive action.

Supporters of the restrictions claim that sweepstakes casinos take use of legal loopholes to provide casino-style games without oversight, making it difficult to regulate responsible gaming. On the other hand, proponents of the business argue that these platforms are entertaining and ought to be controlled rather than shut down.

The broader legal battle over sweepstakes casinos and their connections to large tech corporations is still ongoing, even though Bargo has chosen to dismiss his action. The discussion surrounding these platforms will continue, but it is unclear if he or other litigants would file similar claims in the future.

Join us on all our social channels and groups

Gameongazette is present on: 

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here