The league concedes it is having trouble keeping up with improvements in the nation’s gaming business, as bookmakers fight against fresh planned integrity requirements.
The Australian Football League (AFL) has recognized severe flaws in its integrity framework as it struggles to monitor possible betting-related misbehavior by players, coaches, and staff.
According to league documents, officials are becoming increasingly concerned about the mounting integrity issues associated with the fast expanding sports betting sector.
Current systems for tracking are extremely inefficient
According to a recent story by The Guardian, the league has struggled to adjust to the development of internet betting. With more than 80 bookmakers accepting bets on AFL games, present monitoring systems are insufficient.
The league has limited access to betting transaction data, raising worries about potential blind spots in detecting gaming legislation violations.
The AFL’s concerns stem from a number of worrying incidents. On one occasion, an AFL umpire allegedly offered bettors advance notification of game results. The hack was only discovered after a big financial loss prompted one bookmaker to investigate the situation.
However, difficulties in acquiring and collating data from numerous betting sources impeded the AFL’s ability to respond quickly.
See also:
- Optimove acquires gamification solution provider Adact
- Brazilian Senate Inquiry will return in March
- Caixa is set to operate online sports betting as lottery revenue expands in Brazil
Critics have highlighted the AFL’s close financial ties to the betting industry, with the league earning a fee for each wager placed on its games.
This reliance on gambling money has generated issues about whether the AFL prioritizes integrity or maximizes revenue.
Industry representatives Push for More Reasonable Measures
To address these growing issues, the AFL plans to modernize its integrity monitoring system. The league proposes a centralized database in which bookies must provide precise betting transaction data.
The technology, which would be administered by an external AI-powered corporation, would allow for the detection of fraudulent bets in near real time.
Although the AFL claims such procedures are required to protect the sport’s integrity, some have raised privacy concerns and questioned whether collecting data constitutes regulatory overreach.
Bookmakers have also criticized the notion. Several corporations have claimed that it would impose an unfair burden on their operations and could lead to security concerns.
As the bookmakers and AFL negotiate, the Victorian gaming regulator may be called upon to mediate.
Meanwhile, the league is under increasing pressure from public health experts and former league officials to reevaluate its position on gaming agreements.
As the AFL remains tightly associated with the sports betting industry, some question whether potential revenues will outweigh ethics and transparency.
Join us on all our social channels and groups
Gameongazette is present on:
